top of page
![“All the Courts are polyvocal”: Why Disclosing Contrary Judgements is a Mandatory Duty towards the Court [SC Judgement, May 15, 2026]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/1cd3ab_bdb37917a4804fff9d50a0b1ab8347d4~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_374,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_35,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/1cd3ab_bdb37917a4804fff9d50a0b1ab8347d4~mv2.webp)
![“All the Courts are polyvocal”: Why Disclosing Contrary Judgements is a Mandatory Duty towards the Court [SC Judgement, May 15, 2026]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/1cd3ab_bdb37917a4804fff9d50a0b1ab8347d4~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_356,h_238,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_avif,quality_auto/1cd3ab_bdb37917a4804fff9d50a0b1ab8347d4~mv2.webp)
“All the Courts are polyvocal”: Why Disclosing Contrary Judgements is a Mandatory Duty towards the Court [SC Judgement, May 15, 2026]
In a significant pronouncement aimed at preserving judicial integrity, the Supreme Court has addressed the "unsettling" trend of inconsistent judicial opinions across Indian High Courts. The Court observed that in a "polyvocal" system where tens of orders are pronounced daily, it is impossible for a Bench to be aware of every recent ruling. Consequently, the Court held that the resolution of legal conflicts is “not a matter of Sherlockian deduction” but a shared responsibilit
reetika72
5 days ago3 min read


Are ESOPs "Wages"? Decoding Section 2(y) of the New Labour Code 2026
The operationalisation of the four Labour Codes on May 8 and 9, 2026, has fundamentally rewritten the rules of employment in India. For the startup ecosystem, the notification of over 30 gazette rules represents a "compliance cliff." While founders have historically focused on "burn rates" and "product-market fit," they must now confront a complex regulatory reality: The Wage-Pull-Back. Employee Stock Option Plans (ESOPs) are the primary tool for attracting top-tier talent wi
reetika72
May 136 min read


Apprentice vs. Worker: Terminating Underperformers after the 2026 Rastogi Judgement Without Triggering a "Sham" Lawsuit
By Reetika S. Gupta, Partner at Aristo Legal Under the Apprentices Act, 1961, managing an underperforming apprentice is a fundamentally different legal challenge than managing a regular employee. Despite the 2025 amendments aimed at "Revitalising the Apprenticeship Ecosystem," the core protection for employers remains Section 18: apprentices are trainees, not workers, and labour laws—including the Industrial Disputes Act (ID Act)—do not apply to them. However, the 2026 Rastog
reetika72
Apr 234 min read
bottom of page
